GENIUS Act · Passed Senate 66-32 · May 2025 AICPA AT-C Section 205 · Examination Engagements · Attestation Standard OCC · Proposed Rules · February 2026 FDIC · Proposed Rules · 2026 NCUA · Credit Union Stablecoin Framework · 2026 Compliance Date · Earlier of Jan 18 2027 or 120 days post final rules Phase I Operational · Ethereum · Polygon · Arbitrum · Base CLARITY Act · Senate Banking Committee · 15-9 Vote · May 14 2026 SEC + CFTC · Five-Category Digital Asset Taxonomy · March 17 2026 Stablecoins · Defined Separate Category · Joint SEC/CFTC Oversight GENIUS Act · Passed Senate 66-32 · May 2025 AICPA AT-C Section 205 · Examination Engagements · Attestation Standard OCC · Proposed Rules · February 2026 FDIC · Proposed Rules · 2026 NCUA · Credit Union Stablecoin Framework · 2026 Compliance Date · Earlier of Jan 18 2027 or 120 days post final rules Phase I Operational · Ethereum · Polygon · Arbitrum · Base CLARITY Act · Senate Banking Committee · 15-9 Vote · May 14 2026 SEC + CFTC · Five-Category Digital Asset Taxonomy · March 17 2026 Stablecoins · Defined Separate Category · Joint SEC/CFTC Oversight
GENIUS Act · Stablecoin Reserve Reconciliation

Monthly reserve reconciliation.
Formatted for your CPA. Signed on time.

We demystify the pipeline between your on-chain data and your CPA. Structured reserve reconciliation, formatted to AICPA AT-C Section 205, delivered every reporting period.

Request an Intro Call See the Process
USDC-Mint-Burn-Etherscan-Raw.csv  ·  4,847 rows  ·  Unreviewed
Transaction HashBlockUnix TSDateTime (UTC)From / ToToken Value
0xa3f8c2d1e4b7...1884120317040672302024-01-01 00:00:300x0000...0000 / 0x55fe...8a212500000000000
0x7c2e91a4f63b...1884121917040674422024-01-01 00:03:580x3f4a...d2c1 / 0x0000...0000850000000000
0xd1b4a7e2c938...1884124117040676982024-01-01 00:08:180x0000...0000 / 0x8823...11345000000000000
0x4f7b2a8e1d53...1884126717040680012024-01-01 00:13:210x1c9d...f4e2 / 0x0000...00001200000000000
0x9e3c1d7b4a2f...1884128917040682442024-01-01 00:17:240x0000...0000 / 0xa4c2...775110000000000000
This is what your CPA receives without a structured pipeline. Raw on-chain transfer records. Truncated hashes, zero-address mints, unresolved token values, no reserve context. A qualified accountant performing an examination engagement under AICPA AT-C Section 205 cannot work with this.
01

Blockchain data is formatted for nodes, not accountants

Every mint and burn event exists on-chain. Getting it into a form an auditor can act on is a separate problem. One most issuers have not solved and most CPAs cannot solve for you.

02

Your CPA can attest. They cannot read hex.

A qualified CPA can sign your monthly attestation package. They cannot interpret raw contract data or query on-chain event logs. The translation layer between those two things is the gap.

03

The GENIUS Act does not wait for infrastructure to catch up

The mandate has a compliance date. Building an internal data pipeline from scratch is not realistic in that window for most issuers whose engineering resources are already allocated.

Understanding the Requirement

The law is specific.
The infrastructure is not optional.

This is what the GENIUS Act actually requires, who it applies to, and what the attestation standard demands. The details matter.

The GENIUS Act

Monthly CPA-attested proof that reserves equal circulation

The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act passed the Senate 66-32 in May 2025. It establishes a federal licensing framework for permitted payment stablecoin issuers and creates a mandatory attestation requirement that is a condition of legal operation. Not a disclosure.

Every regulated issuer must produce monthly proof that reserve assets equal or exceed coins in circulation. The proof must come from a qualified CPA. The issuer does not self-certify.

Who It Applies To

Federally chartered, state-regulated, and credit union issuers

The GENIUS Act creates three licensing tracks: OCC-chartered entities (proposed rules February 2026), state-regulated issuers below a circulation threshold, and credit union stablecoin subsidiaries under NCUA jurisdiction (proposed rules 2026, comment period closed April 2026).

State-licensed issuers below $10B in circulation may qualify for a state-law compliance path. The attestation requirement exists at both levels. There is no tier of issuer for whom monthly attestation is not required.

AICPA AT-C Section 205

Examination engagement. Not an audit.

AICPA AT-C Section 205 governs examination engagements. The CPA evaluates whether a subject matter — in this case, the issuer's reserve assertion — conforms to suitable criteria. They issue a conclusion based on documented evidence: on-chain supply figures, reserve confirmation, and reconciliation output.

This is not an audit. The CPA does not issue an opinion on your financial statements. They attest that the reserve assertion is fairly stated based on the evidence examined. For the attestation to be defensible, every figure in the attestation package must be traceable to a documented, reproducible source.

The Compliance Date

Earlier of January 18, 2027 or 120 days after final rules

OCC, FDIC, and NCUA rules are all in proposed rulemaking as of 2026. Final rules could publish in late 2026. The window between final rulemaking and the compliance date is narrow. Potentially 120 days.

The data pipeline, CPA relationship, and reporting cadence all need to be operational and tested before that window closes. A first reporting cycle is not the time to discover infrastructure gaps.

How It Works

A reconciliation package lands with your CPA
every reporting period. They sign it. You are compliant.

Input
Your On-Chain Data
Mint and burn events across every chain in scope. Raw and unstructured.
🌉
TCB
Structured Package
Variance classified. Reserve confirmed. Formatted to AICPA AT-C Section 205.
📋
Review
Your CPA
Receives a complete, verifiable attestation package. No blockchain interpretation required.
Outcome
Signed Attestation
Delivered on cadence. GENIUS Act requirement met.
01

We pull your chain data

Mint and burn events queried directly from the chain. Normalized, decimal-corrected, date-bounded to your reporting period.

02

Your team confirms reserves

Your designated finance contact signs our reserve confirmation template. One document, once per period. No system access required.

03

We build the package

Reconciliation exhibit, variance classification, CPA verification parameters. Everything formatted to AICPA AT-C Section 205.

04

Your CPA signs

Your CPA reviews the attestation package and delivers a signed attestation. We are not in the attestation chain. They are.

The Compliance Bridge LLC does not provide accounting, audit, legal, or attestation services. Nothing in any engagement should be construed as such.

The Deliverable

Three documents.
Two audiences. One signed attestation.

The reconciliation package has a defined structure. Each component serves a specific purpose and a specific recipient.

L1

Executive Summary

Issuer leadership + CPA

Reporting period, On-Chain Supply Change, scope disclosure, reserve position, and CPA attestation reference. Every figure is labeled. Every calculation is traceable. Goes to issuer leadership and the attesting CPA. Formatted for executive review. Totals and conclusions, not chain-level detail. Delivered at every tier.

Preview L1 template →
L2

Reconciliation Exhibit

CPA primary · Issuer on Standard+

The full working document the CPA uses to perform the examination. Chain-by-chain On-Chain Supply Change, Phase I totals, scope disclosure, and reconciliation against the issuer's published all-chain figure. Every variance is classified. Section B.2 explains the delta between Phase I scope and issuer-published circulation. This is what makes the attestation reproducible.

Preview L2 template →
Part E

CPA Verification Parameters

CPA: every cycle, every tier

A permanent reference document sent to your CPA with every attestation package regardless of tier or frequency. Defines data sources, mint and burn event definitions, decimal normalization method, date boundary protocol, chain scope, and compliance threshold. Allows the CPA's attestation to be based on documented, reproducible procedures. Non-depth-gated by design.

Preview Part E →
Chain Architecture

Phase I covers the majority.
Phase II is the difference.

USDC operates on 14 chains. EVM-compatible chains share a common event model and form the Phase I engagement scope. Non-EVM chains require different collection architecture and are Phase II.

Phase I: In Scope
EthereumEVM
PolygonEVM
ArbitrumEVM · L2
BaseEVM · L2

EVM chains use the ERC-20 Transfer event model. Mints are Transfer events where from = zero address. Burns are Transfer events where to = zero address. This pattern is consistent across all four Phase I chains and can be queried directly from on-chain event logs.

Phase II: Deferred (Non-EVM Architecture)
SolanaSealevel VM
TronTRC-20
Avalanche · Optimism · Noble · Stellar · Hedera · Algorand · Sui · AptosDeferred

Solana (Sealevel) and Tron (TRC-20) do not share the ERC-20 Transfer event model. Each requires chain-specific parsing logic. These are the primary contributors to the scope variance between Phase I figures and issuer-published all-chain circulation. That variance is expected, classifiable, and disclosed in every L2 package.

Proof of Process: January 2024 · USDC · Ethereum · Validated Against Circle / Deloitte
Opening On-Chain Supply$26,739,379,540
Total Mints (ETH)+ $7,870,000,000
Total Burns (ETH)- $6,640,000,000
On-Chain Supply Change: Phase I Ethereum+ $1,230,000,000
Circle All-Chain Attestation (Deloitte)+ $1,570,000,000
Scope Variance (Phase II: Solana, Tron + other)$340,000,000
The $340M variance is attributable to net supply movement on Solana and Tron during the period. Chains outside Phase I scope. This is a defined scope boundary, not a reconciliation error. The Phase I reconciliation is complete and accurate within its defined chains. This data was validated against Circle's Deloitte-attested all-chain figure during TCB's proof-of-process build.
Pricing

Every engagement
starts on Foundation.

All first clients begin at monthly frequency. No exceptions. This protects your first cycle and ours. After you have seen your first package and understand your own numbers, upgrades are available.

Monthly
Standard
Proactive monitoring · available after first cycle
From $3,000 / month
Scales by circulation size. Full 7-day coverage.

  • Monthly reconciliation and attestation package
  • CPA-ready package delivered monthly
  • L2 Reconciliation Exhibit to you directly
  • Monthly reserve reconciliation
  • Variance analysis at every period
  • Part E: CPA Parameters every cycle
Requires one completed Foundation cycle
Monthly
Premium
Board-level visibility · available after first cycle
From $6,000 / month
Scales by circulation size. Maximum depth.

  • Monthly reconciliation and attestation package
  • Full attestation package delivered monthly
  • Complete reserve documentation
  • Maximum depth for institutional review
  • L2 Exhibit delivered monthly to you and your CPA
  • Full methodology file (NDA required)
Requires one completed Foundation cycle
Pilot
$500 one-time: proof of process

One month, one chain. See the deliverable before committing to a recurring engagement. Applies as credit toward Foundation within 60 days if you convert.

Pricing scales by circulation size and chain configuration. Issuers operating on more than four chains or non-standard blockchain architectures are priced on a custom engagement basis. Contact TCB directly before qualifying.

Questions

What people
actually ask.

Can I build this pipeline myself?+

Yes, technically. You would need an on-chain query setup for each EVM chain you operate on, a method to pull Fiat Reserve Balance data from your custodian, a reconciliation process that produces output formatted to AICPA AT-C Section 205 examination engagement standards, and a cadenced delivery system that maintains documentation for CPA review.

The technical components exist and are publicly available. What most issuers are deciding is whether this is an internal function or an external one. The compliance function needs to be operational and tested before the compliance date. Not under construction during the first reporting cycle.

Do I need a CPA already?+

Yes. TCB produces the reconciliation package. Your CPA performs the examination and delivers the signed attestation. We are not in the attestation chain. That relationship is yours to establish.

If you do not have a CPA with AICPA AT-C Section 205 examination engagement experience, we can describe what to look for. The CPA selection is your decision and the engagement relationship is yours.

What if the numbers do not match?+

Variances are expected and classifiable. Most arise from multi-chain scope: what is captured in Phase I versus what the issuer publishes across all chains, timing differences at period boundaries, or rounding at the decimal normalization step.

Actual reserve shortfalls where Fiat Reserve Balance is genuinely less than Closing On-Chain Supply are a different category. The exhibit discloses and classifies every variance. Your CPA determines materiality. Our job is to make sure nothing is obscured.

What does TCB actually see?+

Public on-chain transfer data and your signed reserve confirmation. One document per reporting period confirming your Fiat Reserve Balance for that period.

We do not have access to your bank accounts, your custody arrangements, or your internal financial systems beyond the single confirmed figure on the reserve confirmation template. The template is designed to collect exactly what the examination engagement requires. Nothing more.

Which chains do you support right now?+

Phase I: Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base. These four EVM-compatible chains cover the majority of USDC circulation. If your issuance is distributed across these chains, an engagement is viable now.

If you operate primarily on Solana or Tron, contact us before qualifying. We will tell you directly whether an engagement makes sense before any scope discussion.

Why does every engagement start at monthly?+

Two reasons. First, monthly is the GENIUS Act minimum. Every issuer needs a working monthly process regardless of what they ultimately want. Second, the first reporting cycle is where we both learn your specific chain configuration, reserve structure, and variance profile.

After cycle one, upgrading to Standard or Premium is straightforward. Premium adds access to the Perpetual Tracker — a running on-chain supply record updated each cycle.

What is the difference between what I receive and what my CPA receives?+

Foundation tier: you receive the L1 Executive Summary. Your CPA receives the L2 Reconciliation Exhibit and Part E: CPA Verification Parameters. Standard and above: you also receive the L2 exhibit directly.

Part E goes to your CPA every cycle, every tier, without exception. It defines our data sources, event definitions, decimal normalization, date boundaries, and chain scope. It is what makes the attestation defensible. We do not gate it by tier because the quality of the attestation should not depend on what the issuer is paying.

30 minutes.
Fit confirmed before scope or pricing.

Come prepared to discuss your chain configuration, projected circulation size, and current attestation process. If it is not a fit, we will tell you in the first call.

Phone 910.724.0719
City Pueblo, CO. Serving nationally.

No pitch deck. No obligation. Fit confirmed first.